This blog tries to explain current issues and misconceptions about Islam.
Stylistic Aspect of the Revelation.
Published on October 20, 2010 By survivalstory In Religion

Throughout ages, people have, widely, differed on the issue of Quran. For many non-Muslims, the Quran was, and is still, believed to be a "piece of litterature", that some could go too far as to say that Quran is poetry due to its usage of rythms and rhyms. Proving that the Quran is divine requires proving, in the first hand, that the it was a revelation upon Prophet Muhammad (pbuh); ie to prove that the Quran was revealed, then recited, but not written. Quran is an Arabic word, which ,simply, means recitation. Most dictionnaries define revelation as the fact of "disclosing a secret to someone", while recitation is defined as an "oral response from a pupil to a teacher" or "or as a period of classroom instruction". While pondering over these terms, it would be clear that revelation and recitation portray a verbal communication involving two people; one is holding the status of a teacher,disclosing a message, while the other is a pupil, receiving it and replying back. In fact, this was quite the same with Prophet Muhammad receiving the divine message(through Angel Gabriel) and reciting it back to people. Naming this Holy Book as "Quran", (or "recitation") is not a coincidence, but it is a proof that it was a revelation; a verbal communication between Muhammad (pbuh) and God through the angel Gabriel.

To illustrate this fact, let us move now to the style of the Quran. The Quran contains rythms and rhyms that is true, yet it would be silly to call it poetry. Despite the fact that the Quran contains rhymed verses, this is not a dominant feature, the way it is with classical Arabic peotry, which relies only on rhyms. The Quran holds other varieties of style, which all of them rely, basically, on an oral process of communication. A stunning feature of the Quranic style is that of order or instruction. God says in the Holy Quran:

 “Read in the name of your Lord who created -created Man from a clot. Read: for your Lord is Most Bountiful, who teaches by the pen, teaches Man that which he knew not.” (Quran : The Embryon 96:1-5).

‘O you (Muhammad) enveloped (in garments)! Arise and warn! And your Lord (Allah) magnify! And your garments purify! And keep away from Ar-Rujz (the idols)!’" [74:1-5]

These were the first verses revealed, gradually, to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in Hiraa's cave, through the Angel Gabriel. God begins the revelation by the word "read". Its usage (twice) in the verse of The Embryon refers to a divine order to "read", ie to get education and knowledge, as the Prophet was an illeterate person. The second revelation moves from the instruction to "read" (to get knowledge on human creation), to the divine instruction to "arise and warn". These verses, being revealed in different stages proves a logical coherence between revealing knowledge, and then reciting and "spreading it to people. Just these two verses, out of many, are great proofs of Quran as a verbal discourse, or a process of communication between God and Muhammad (pbuh), which is highly stressed by the usage of the pronoun "you" and verbs of command. Another stunning style is the inversion of the order of human language, when God says " your Lord mangnify", "your garment purify". Besides, we notice repeated words, to stress the idea of command and highlight the importance of this divine message. For humans, to write by using repetition or inverting the verb/subject/object order create disorder, confusion to the reader, and is wholly regarded as an unskilful usage of language. However, for a divine message like these verses, it creates an accurate usage of language, and a unique style. Now, let us move to another example of verbal discourse. God says in the Holy Quran:

"Say: He is Allah the One and Only. Allah, the eternal, absolute; He begets not, nor is He begotten. And there is none like unto Him" "Say: I seek refuge with the Lord of the dawn from the mischief of created things; from the mischief of darkness as it overspreads; from the mischief of those who practice secret arts, and from the mischief of the envious one, as he practices envy."

There are many verses in Quran beginning with the word "say". To began with it, initiates, beforehand, a question that God is repying to, by a ready-made answer. Whenever the Prophet Muhammad was introduced to a new situation in his life, or was asked about the nature of God, or any specific question that the Prophet can not handle, God reveals another verse depicting the situation and providing answers. "Say" proves, strongly, the concept of revelation, and recitation: God reveals "the answer" (the verse), and commands the Prophet to recite it to people. Examples like this are many in Quran, I just can not cite them all to avoid repetition and summerize my ideas the best I can. Yet, this is one stylistic features among many others, such as oath and story-telling.

Reading the Quran in this light is a proof that it was not written by humans, because if not it would be totally different. Human books are often shaped with the traditional structure of introduction, devellopement, and conclusion, which the Quranic style contradicts. Besides, while reading the Quran, we realise that we can move through different issues in just one verse, while the next issues remain unpredictable till we get to them, which human writting does not as it focuses on one theme, and then moves to another in a quite calculated way.

Tell me, how can Muhammad (pbuh) write Quran if he is illeterate? And if it was written for him according to his instructions, why would the Prophet would mention his status as a messenger, and not as a deity? Just to believe that Quran is human is silly, because how would Muhammad know about the past stories of tribes and Prophets that existed before him long years ago? How would an illeterate man, living in the desert treat issues of war, judicial issues, commercial dealings, and scientific facts, that have been discoverd of late?

This is a very interesting site, which provides modern scientific discoveries, which have been dealt by the Quran, before any human can know anything about science:

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/index.php

                                                      A. Siham


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Oct 21, 2010

No, I believe what I find logical. God has created us, and sent us messengers comming with the same message, which is to worship only one God, the creator of the whole universe, heaven and earth. He create us for a purpose: to worship God alone and none but God, we do not worship our messengers (Jesus, mose, Muhammad) (peace be upon them all), but we respect them and take lessons from their stories. to believe that Jesus is the lord, or woship Jesus is polytheism. and Polytheism is the biggest sin of all.

Quran is the word of God, and modern science has proved that, because all the scientific discoveries that was discovered throughout history are mentioned in Quran, do you know about the knocking stars?

on Oct 21, 2010

do you know about the knocking stars?

No.  And I am content in my ignorance of that topic.  (I realize how "western" that sounds....not very Aristotelian, and likely that attitude is why the west endured the dark ages while the Arabs continued with metaphysical exploration...but, just call me a product of my culture.)

I don't plan to know (as if anyone could) all there is to know in the world in my life time.

So, I pick things that interest me, are forced upon me, or that will improve my life or someone else's.

Your god, your prophets, your book's view of the world, just really.....don't meet that criteria imo. 

(Though occasionally it is fun to debate different tenets, but my heart is just never in it for long.)

I'm sure you will have many interesting convo's here at JU though.

Many.

 

 

on Oct 21, 2010

No, I believe what I find logical.

If that were true you would not believe in God as there is no logic in believing something you can not prove exist. Belief in God is based on faith not logic just like it would be illogical to believe you can be cured just by praying, not that it can't happen but it's not logical.

on Oct 21, 2010

Hello Trova I did not mean to say that you may be 'ignorant'.No never! we are all still learning in this life. I just wanted to share with you something that I have discovered and that people wrote about it before I did. that 's all. there is no harm in knowing things, as every knowledge improves our lives.

you said: Your god, your prophets, your book's view of the world, just really.....don't meet that criteria imo. 

'Your' God and 'my' God are just one, not two. why people seek to create gaps between them. we are humans created by one God. one God means a peaceful life, despite differences of views .why people want to make their lives controlled by different lords, while there is only one? Really sad! Jesus is our Prophet as he is yours. He was too modest as to abide by the rules of God, and as not to say that he was divine. eventhough the creation of Adam and Jesus was made through a miracle, that does not mean that Adam is the son of God. God has created him not begotten him the same as Jesus.

 I have just began blogging here but I have written so many little articles (in other blogs) from so long, and I will share them with you and all interested in reading and discovering things.

any way, we are just discussing, and I respect differences.

welcome.

 

on Oct 21, 2010

Hello charles

There are so many facts about the existence of God, and this has logic behind. and this logic strenghtens my faith. Indeed, I can not see God, but I see his presence in our lives, in the universe, in humankind, in the ordered design of heaven and earth. do you think that this came by chance? Chance is illogical idea. my little room for example is not being tidy just by chance, but because I have cleaned it and I feel happy out it. the computor I am blogging on, did not came by chance, but someone made it, yes I did not see this person, but this person exist, and I am grateful to him.the cloths I wear did not come by chance on me, but someone made them, and I am grateful to this person, even if I do not see him. in a word, everything which happens in my and your life is the result of a cause/effect relationship, and this cause/effect is the result of interaction between different members. there is no chance. we do not suceed or fail in life because of chance, but because we were either hard-working, thinking , or just lazy people.

welcome.

on Oct 21, 2010

Hello Trova I did not mean to say that you may be 'ignorant'.

I didn't mean to imply YOU called me ignorant, I called myself that....lol.  But thank you for coming to my defense!

on Oct 21, 2010

Survivalstory posts:

Hello, my questions are more rhetorical. no, Jesus was never the son of God, and he never died for the sin of mankind.

 

Jesus never said that he was the son of God

As you can plainly see Tova supplied quite a few passages that say otherwise.

Here's another from St.John 1

47 Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him: and he saith of him: Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom there is no guile. 48 Nathanael saith to him: Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered, and said to him: Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. 49 Nathanael answered him, and said: Rabbi, thou art the Son of God, thou art the King of Israel.

Now, if Jesus was not the Son of God, He would have rebuked Nathanael for calling Him the Son of God, but He didn't.

The Bible clearly has Jesus as the Son of God while Qur'anic teachings deny this...it's just one more of those radical disagreements between the Qur'an and the Holy Bible.

...............

Hello, my questions are more rhetorical. no, Jesus was never the son of God, and he never died for the sin of mankind.

 You must read St. Paul to the Hebrews, chapter 9 and 10 for they refute your claim.

9:13-15,

 

11 But Christ, being come an high priest of the good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle not made with hand, that is, not of this creation: 12 Neither by the blood of goats, or of calves, but by his own blood, entered once into the holies, having obtained eternal redemption. 13 For if the blood of goats and of oxen, and the ashes of an heifer being sprinkled, sanctify such as are defiled, to the cleansing of the flesh: 14 How much more shall the blood of Christ, who by the Holy Ghost offered himself unspotted unto God, cleanse our conscience from dead works, to serve the living God? 15 And therefore he is the mediator of the new testament: that by means of his death, for the redemption of those transgressions, which were under the former testament, they that are called may receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

Verse 12 "Eternal redemption"... By that one sacrifice of his blood, once offered on the cross, Christ our Lord paid and exhibited, once for all, the general price and ransom of all mankind: which no other priest could do.

 

on Oct 21, 2010

Quran does not enumerate that God is father, because He is not. God is our creator, not our "father". there is no contradiction in Quran.

Well then, here is another case in point where the Qur'an contradicts the Holy Bible.

When Jesus was asked how we should pray to God, He said to pray to God calling Him, Our Father.

St.Matthew 6:6-13,

 

6 But when thou shalt pray, enter into thy chamber, and having shut the door, pray to thy Father in secret: and thy Father who seeth in secret will repay thee. 7 And when you are praying, speak not much, as the heathens. For they think that in their much speaking they may be heard. 8 Be not you therefore like to them, for your Father knoweth what is needful for you, before you ask him. 9 Thus therefore shall you pray: Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. 10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.

11 Give us this day our supersubstantial bread. 12 And forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors. 13 And lead us not into temptation. But deliver us from evil. Amen. 14 For if you will forgive men their offences, your heavenly Father will forgive you also your offences. 15But if you will not forgive men, neither will your Father forgive you your offences.

 

on Oct 21, 2010

The people of the book used to know that a Prophet would come after Jesus, they kept waiting for him to come, because it was revealed in their holy books, they taught that the comming prophet would be one from their tribes, but to their suprise, they found that he was an Arab, and that is why they refused to submit.

The people of the Book taht you are referring to here are the Jews and as I have already explained on your other blog in detail, the PROPHET that Moses prophecied was to come and did come to the Jewish nation was Jesus the Christ. While some of the Jews believed He was the Emmanuel, God with us, many of the Jews rejected Him.

 

 

 

Lula posts:

For example, Muslims through reading the Qur'an believe that Jesus is not the Son of God but a mere mortal man only prophet who prepares for the last and greatest prophet Mohammed. Believing that Jesus is the Son of God is blasphemy punishable by death. Christ's Redemption of all mankind is completely absent in the Qur'an.

SS posts: 

You seem to contradict yourself, at first you said that there is only one God, you then said : Believing that Jesus is the Son of God is blasphemy punishable by death, and you also say at the end that : The Christ on the other hand claimed over and over that He was God. please review what you said.

I'm sorry if there was any confusion. I was referring to the Muslims. If Muslims believe that Jesus is the Son of God then that would be blasphemy and punishable by death.

 

on Oct 21, 2010

Hello,

 the bible will NOT prove to me in any way that Jesus is son of God. so why you say that the Prophet mentioned in Mose verse was Jesus? YOU CONTRADICT ALL WHAT YOU STRUGGLED TO EXPLAIN. Quran is more unified, it says from beggining to end that Jesus is a Prophet. Bible contains so many Gospels and so many writers..I find peace in the unicity of Quran.

2-who told you that believing in Jesus is son of God is a punishable by death???? you still do not understand what you have read. there is no passage in Quran which says this!!!!!!!!

3-You said that the son or brother in law of Muhammad was the one who recorded Quran. you were confused in this also as to claim first that he was son of law and then said brother in law. review what you write please. and neither of them was the one to record the revelation, but they were companions of the Prophet. your informations are wrong, and make you more confused in your belief.

Welcome.

on Oct 21, 2010

I'm sorry if there was any confusion. I was referring to the Muslims. If Muslims believe that Jesus is the Son of God then that would be blasphemy and punishable by death.

2-who told you that believing in Jesus is son of God is a punishable by death???? you still do not understand what you have read. there is no passage in Quran which says this!!!!!!!!

Okay. I'll take your word for it. So, if a Muslim reasons that Jesus is the Son of God, and comes to believe this.... what happens to him? Anything?  

 

on Oct 21, 2010

Hello again,

It is God who is the last Judge in matter of faith, not people! There is no verse in Quran which says this! if you are alluding to apostacy, that is a quite different issue. Do you mean apostacy???? If yes, I will write a little post about it, whenever I have time, because this has a different story which happened at the time of the Prophet (pbuh)..peace!

have a nice time. 

 

on Oct 22, 2010

3-You said that the son or brother in law of Muhammad was the one who recorded Quran. you were confused in this also as to claim first that he was son of law and then said brother in law. review what you write please. and neither of them was the one to record the revelation, but they were companions of the Prophet. your informations are wrong, and make you more confused in your belief.

Welcome.

First of all, Thank you for noting my mistake regarding Uthman, the son-in-law of Mohammed. I have corrected my post #9 to "son-in-law."

Secondly,

After he passed away the third Khalifa (successor) Othman Ben-Affan ordered all writersand companion to meet in a conference and put the whole text in a single Book.

From history textbooks as well as encyclopedias, the information is the same about Mohammed and the Qur'an. They all state that Uthman was Mohammed's son-in-law.

Below is what I found on the Internet regarding Uthman. It seems that even the Muslims themselves argue over their own history.

 Uthman

Uthmān ibn ‘Affān (Arabic: عثمان بن عفان) (c 580 - July 17, 656) a son-law of Muhammad, is the third Caliph  of Islam. He is regarded by Sunni Muslims as the third of the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs of Islam.  However, Shia Muslims believe Ali was the first legitimate ruler after Muhammad, and disregard the rule of the first three Caliphs, including Uthman.

Following the assassination of Umar in 644, a six-member committee appointed by him to choose as caliph selected Uthman b. Affan (644-656), a member of the prestigious Umayyad clan. During Umar's reign, grievances stifled under Umar's heavy-handed rule came to the fore. Among the members of the opposition was Ali b. Abi Talib, another  son-in-law of Muhammad, Ali became the fourth caliph after Uthman's assassination.

Uthman attempted to maintain the integrity of the empire by appointing members of his own clan, the Umayyads, to governorships; the governorship of his kinsman Muawiya was enlarged to include all Syria and northern Iraq. This led to the charge of nepotism by Uthman's enemies. Secondly, his wars of conquest were not sufficiently lucrative in terms of booty to maintain hic court, forcing a reduction in salaries of soldiers, creating more discontent. Uthman also aroused angry by  authorizing an official version of the Quran, burning all other copies. Uthman was unable to maintain discipline and stability. A revolt broke out in Egypt. He was overthrown and murdered in 656, and succeeded by Ali.

Anyway, note the highlighted in red.

You wrote:

Quran was revealed by God to Muhammad (may God bless him) through the angel Gabriel. After revelation, the Prophet used to appoint writers to record down the revelation at the presence of Gabriel, the Prophet always asked the writer to recite back what he wrote to make sure the writer did not miss or add anything inadvertently. He had few of them and those writers kept the pieces of cloth paper, slates and animal bones with them and frequently were asked to add new revelations whenever it came to the Prophet. they instructed them as to where to put the new revelation in relation to what they wrote before. In the last year of his life (PPUH) he and Archangel Gabriel reviewedthe whole complete text with it order of chapters and verses.

They reviewed and confirmed each others' texts and presented the final single text to Othman who ordered 4 more copies to be made and sent to different regions of the Islamic State at the time.

Why would Uthman have to order all other copies to be burned if it is as you claim that Angel Gabriel reviewed the whole complete text? 

 

on Oct 22, 2010

Hello, many companions of the Prophet used to note down copies of Quran as they heard it from the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). what they used to write was not done by the order of the Prophet and with the presence of Archangle Gabriel, and it was not verified either, (so taking random notes like this without verifying with the Presence of the Prophet could contain mistakes ) and this also gave rise among the companions regarding these copies . so when Uthman knew about this he consulted the Prophet and took from him the original copy of Quran and appointed a commitee of writers to write it down with the presence of the Prophet himself and burned all the copies that he doubted. 

take care!

on Oct 22, 2010

Hello, many companions of the Prophet used to note down copies of Quran as they heard it from the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). what they used to write was not done by the order of the Prophet

Your explanation in #29 is at odds with your previous explanation ......

Quran was revealed by God to Muhammad (may God bless him) through the angel Gabriel. After revelation, the Prophet used to appoint writers to record down the revelation at the presence of Gabriel, the Prophet always asked the writer to recite back what he wrote to make sure the writer did not miss or add anything inadvertently. He had few of them and those writers kept the pieces of cloth paper, slates and animal bones with them and frequently were asked to add new revelations whenever it came to the Prophet. they instructed them as to where to put the new revelation in relation to what they wrote before. In the last year of his life (PPUH) he and Archangel Gabriel reviewedthe whole complete text with it order of chapters and verses.

Another point:

You write:

so when Uthman knew about this he consulted the Prophet and took from him the original copy of Quran and appointed a commitee of writers to write it down with the presence of the Prophet himself and burned all the copies that he doubted.

I understand that the verses that the Caliph Uthman rejected when he compiled the first Qur'an was in 651AD. Now how could Mohammed be with him personally when Mohammed died in 632?

 

3 Pages1 2 3